| Summary: | RHEL4.9 guest get many lost ticks warning and become very slowly | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Joy Pu <ypu> |
| Component: | kvm | Assignee: | Virtualization Maintenance <virt-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.7 | CC: | juzhang, mkenneth, tburke, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-07-17 12:57:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 580948 | ||
|
Description
Joy Pu
2011-06-03 03:35:07 UTC
Can you test that with raw format instead of qcow2? qcow2 of a new snapshot might block and will be the cause for the lost ticks. (In reply to comment #1) > Can you test that with raw format instead of qcow2? > qcow2 of a new snapshot might block and will be the cause for the lost ticks. I submit a job for this case with raw format and it already run 100 times, didn't hit this problem. |