Bug 710906 (oct-signal)

I will take the review.

Ping José? Are you going to do the review or not?

Looks like José is MIA. Taking over review.

rpmlint output:
octave-signal.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %40unreal
octave-signal.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided octave-forge
octave-signal.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/octave/packages/signal-1.0.11/packinfo/.autoload
octave-signal.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/octave/packages/signal-1.0.11/packinfo/.autoload
octave-signal.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun cp
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

These are OK.

**

Here you have the correct dependency to octave(api). Good.

I wouldn't mind a comment about Patch0, e.g. "Fix the address of FSF.", though.

**

You are missing the -v flag from mkoctfile in the Makefile to get the build commands to display. Fix this in the nostrip patch.

**

Change the summary to "Signal processing tools for Octave"
                                         ^^^^^
**

Why are you using 

%octave_cmd pkg build '-verbose' '-nodeps'
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{_arch} %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}

instead of

%octave_pkg_build ?

**

MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the  Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK
- Actual license is GPLv3+, not GPLv2+.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK
$ md5sum signal-1.0.11.tar.gz ../SOURCES/signal-1.0.11.tar.gz 
808a4b5d3c7953e1ac66ef870693cfa5  signal-1.0.11.tar.gz
808a4b5d3c7953e1ac66ef870693cfa5  ../SOURCES/signal-1.0.11.tar.gz

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK
- Add "-v" to mkoctfile command in Makefile to see flags.

MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned, architecture dependent dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

Thank you for taking the review!

I have addressed your points:
http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15.src.rpm

All issues have been fixed, so this package is

APPROVED.

Same note as in bug #710905: be sure to build against octave-3.4.2-2.

Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: octave-signal
Short Description: Signal processing tools for Octave
Owners: sailer
Branches: f15 f16
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16

octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15

octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

octave-signal-1.0.11-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.