Bug 711388

Summary: [abrt] gnome-panel-2.32.0.2-2.fc14: on_factory_appeared: Process /usr/bin/gnome-panel was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mike Stefanelli <mjstefl>
Component: gnome-panelAssignee: Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: rstrode
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7658325cd1b3003d24fa9b0140c02081cfb1f44c
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 15:57:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Mike Stefanelli 2011-06-07 11:09:47 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.18
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 21525 bytes
cmdline: gnome-panel
comment: sytem was starting up
component: gnome-panel
Attached file: coredump, 37711872 bytes
crash_function: on_factory_appeared
executable: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
kernel: 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686.PAE
package: gnome-panel-2.32.0.2-2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gnome-panel was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1307444849
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.crashed on boot up
2.
3.
Comment 1 Mike Stefanelli 2011-06-07 11:09:49 UTC 
Created attachment 503449 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Mike Stefanelli 2011-11-04 13:45:51 UTC 
Package: gnome-panel-2.32.0.2-2.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1during the boot up process
2.logged in aswith my user ID
3.
Comment 3 abrt-bot 2012-03-20 15:57:20 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #659899, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #653394, bug #659899

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 659899 ***