Bug 7122
Summary: | FEATURE: "combo packages" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Pierre Phaneuf <pp> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-02-11 12:53:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pierre Phaneuf
1999-11-18 23:17:49 UTC
I believe this is called transaction sets, and it might be implemented already. jbj would have to comment on it though. Actually, these are what I call "package bundles", which are now possible because the rpm database permits concurrent access. That means you can make a meta rpm that runs "rpm -Uvh ..." in %post, and "rpm -e ..." in %preun. Dunno if it works, but all the above is now implemented, so I'm gonna close this bug. Where would the sub-packages RPM files be stored? I wouldn't want a "foo" meta-package that contains a "foo1" and a "foo2" RPMs to leave these RPMs around in some directory all the time that it exists. Can you have files part of a package that are not "installed" on the system (they would be deleted after %post, maybe?). |