Bug 712252

Summary: vmscan: correctly check if reclaimer should schedule during shrink_slab
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange>
Component: kernelAssignee: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Caspar Zhang <czhang>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: czhang, juzhang, kzhang, qcai, tburke
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-169.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 13:38:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Andrea Arcangeli 2011-06-09 23:25:41 UTC
Description of problem: It has been reported on some laptops that kswapd is consuming large amounts of CPU and not being scheduled when SLUB is enabled during large amounts of file copying.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: not clear


Steps to Reproduce:
1. run a large amount of small file copying
2.
3.
  
Actual results: higher kswapd utilization


Expected results: lower kswapd untilization and better latency


Additional info:

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-06-13 09:29:54 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 3 Aristeu Rozanski 2011-07-18 15:27:54 UTC
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-169.el6

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 13:38:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1530.html