Bug 712408

Summary: dates do not appear in contract selection dialog
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: Bryan Kearney <bkearney>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: J.C. Molet <jmolet>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.1CC: alikins, bkearney, cduryee, jmolet, jwest, pm-eus
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-27 06:54:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 703921    
Bug Blocks:    

Description RHEL Program Management 2011-06-10 13:42:09 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #703921 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.1 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 3 Adrian Likins 2011-06-10 19:28:46 UTC
commit 4b6053547f76dffe495e1cae1758c8cf9fb77da2
Author: Adrian Likins <alikins>
Date:   Wed May 11 13:17:34 2011 -0400

    712408: contract selection was not showing dates for pools
    
    contract_selection dialog was expecting datetime objects
    that it was passing to a CellRendererDate, but was getting
    strings of is8601 dates instead, so convert those strings
    to datetime. Also, the model was expecting strings, change
    to gobject.TYPE_PYOBJECT
    
    (merge)

Comment 5 J.C. Molet 2011-06-21 19:05:28 UTC
Contract dates show properly in the contract selection dialog.  Marking VERIFIED.

subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.17-1.el6_1.x86_64

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-06-27 06:54:56 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0902.html