Bug 712560

Update version:
Add gnome-shell default theme to theme selector.

SPEC:
http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/gnome-shell/extensions/SPECS/gnome-shell-extensions-theme-selector.spec

SRPM:
http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/gnome-shell/extensions/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extensions-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15.src.rpm

Renamed from gnome-shell-extensions-theme-selector to gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector

SPEC:
http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/gnome-shell/extensions/SPECS/gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector.spec

SRPM:
http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/gnome-shell/extensions/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15.src.rpm

Package Review
==============

Package: 

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture
     Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3141281
 [x] Rpmlint output:
     Source RPM:
     [fab@laptop021 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15.src.rpm 
     gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector.src: W: no-%build-section
     1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
     Binary RPM(s):
     [fab@laptop021 noarch]$ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15.noarch.rpm
     1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable
 [-] Buildroot is correct (if it's still used)
     master   : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
     spec file: 
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
     License type: GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc

 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL
     Upstream source: 61640cfdc9ad1a418b18d6be195705f5  themeselector-0.9.tar.gz
     Build source:    61640cfdc9ad1a418b18d6be195705f5  themeselector-0.9.tar.gz
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.  %find_lang used for locales
 [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
 [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 [-] Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work.
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates
 [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files
 [-] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section (if it's still used)
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime
 [-] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (if it's still used)
 [-] Included tests passed successfully 
 [x] Package consistently uses macros
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content
 [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8

 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required
 [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present
 [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present
 [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
 [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete
 [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
 
 [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application
 [-] Follows desktop entry spec
 [-] Valid .desktop Name
 [-] Valid .desktop GenericName
 [-] Valid .desktop Categories
 [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
 [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install
 [x] Spec use %global instead of %define
 [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
 [-] Latest version is packaged
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available
 [x] Package functions as described
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct
 [-] File based requires are sane
 [x] Changelog in allowed format

Wouldn't it be nice if the summary starts with a capital letter?

Beside that I see no further blocker, package APPROVED.

I will change the summary to start with a capital letter.

Thanks for the review

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector
Short Description: Gnome shell user theme selector 
Owners: timlau
Branches: f15
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15

gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.

gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector-0.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.