Bug 712693
| Summary: | Review Request: libsysactivity - Library for retrieving statistics of the system`s activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Carlos Olmedo Escobar <carlos.olmedo.e> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jamatos, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-07-10 23:51:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Carlos Olmedo Escobar
2011-06-12 14:27:14 UTC
I'm also the upstream developer of libsysactivity. Hi Carlos, in order to be a Fedora packager you need to be follows the instructions given at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and as it says in that page you should show that you understand the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines The way we usually access the understanding of the packaging guidelines is through the revision of other packages submissions. Since you are not yet a packager those reviews are not official but they allow me to see your understanding of the guidelines. So if you want to choose two or three packages to review I am available to sponsor you in the process. Yes, sure. It's the only way to ensure that new packagers will do a good work. So should i choose two or three from here? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=Review+Request With NEW status perhaps? Please do. :-) |