| Summary: | Please rebuild for new libmtp soname | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Linus Walleij <triad> |
| Component: | python-pymtp | Assignee: | Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpvainio> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | vpvainio |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-21 06:06:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Linus Walleij
2011-06-12 17:19:46 UTC
I've been getting the automatic emails, I just haven't had time to look into this. A rebuild may not be the real solution here, it depends on the changes done to libmtp. The last time the libmtp soname was bumped, the Debian developers had to write this patch: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/pymtp/0.0.4-2/adapt-to-libmtp8.diff PyMTP needs to be in Fedora because it's a dependency of gPodder. If you want co-maintainer access on python-libmtp, just apply in pkgdb. That patch still applies and really just seems like some ordinary development to keep up with the .so.8 interface. The parts the patch touches haven't changed in the last release, nor have I added any new externally visible API fields you need to handle. If the pymtp wrapper is totally dynamically linking to libmtp, I guess you could just bump the dependency... (I'll apply for comaintainership though, could be useful.) Submitted and built.Home | New | Search | Browse | Front Page | My B |