Bug 713185

Summary: [vdsm] getStorageDomainsList displays the same domain twice.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: David Naori <dnaori>
Component: vdsmAssignee: Igor Lvovsky <ilvovsky>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: yeylon <yeylon>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: abaron, bazulay, hateya, iheim, lpeer, mgoldboi, srevivo, ykaul
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9-79 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 07:21:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description David Naori 2011-06-14 15:32:28 UTC
Description of problem: getStorageDomainsList displays the same domain (blockSD) twice:

[root@camel-vdsa images]# vdsClient -s 0 getStorageDomainsList
a1dc6df5-97f7-44e0-a267-b22d3987d3eb
a1dc6df5-97f7-44e0-a267-b22d3987d3eb
47172803-d3ee-421b-9f47-764d2580bd4e

the problem is fileSD scanDomains returns blockSD aswell. 

def scanDomains(pattern="*"):
    log = logging.getLogger("scanDomains")

    finalPat = os.path.join(sd.StorageDomain.storage_repository,
                            sd.DOMAIN_MNT_POINT, pattern)
    mntList = glob.glob(finalPat)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.9-75

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.add blockSD

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Igor Lvovsky 2011-06-16 06:46:47 UTC
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/#change,593

Comment 7 David Naori 2011-07-07 13:14:23 UTC
Verified
vdsm-4.9-80.el6.x86_64

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 07:21:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html