Bug 713216

Summary: [abrt] openoffice.org-brand-3.2.1-19.6.el6_0.5: Process /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Red Hat Case Diagnostics <case-diagnostics>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: dtardon
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a568f7ab2e297c0130edacb82e86ee9c6c822b01
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-06 08:25:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
Comment none

Description Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-06-14 17:04:37 UTC
Created attachment 915329 [details]
Comment

(This comment was longer than 65,535 characters and has been moved to an attachment by Red Hat Bugzilla).

Comment 2 Red Hat Case Diagnostics 2011-06-14 17:05:22 UTC
Created attachment 504725 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 5 David Tardon 2011-06-15 07:33:34 UTC
We saw this in the past (e.g., bug 468639), but were unable to find the problem. Are you able to reproduce this?

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:17:56 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 7 Caolan McNamara 2011-07-06 08:07:29 UTC
no response

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 08:25:11 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.