Bug 713603

Summary:	[ipa webui] inconsistent user member list
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Yi Zhang <yzhang>
Component:	ipa	Assignee:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.0	CC:	benl, dpal, jgalipea
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ipa-2.1.0-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Do not document	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 18:34:02 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Yi Zhang 2011-06-15 21:55:47 UTC

Description of problem:
IPA supports nested group. That means for one group, there are direct user members and in-direct members (member in nested groups).
However, in Web UI, if one group has no direct user member, the UI page will show no user member at all. As long as there is one direct user member, all direct members and indirecst member will show up. This listing feature is inconsistent. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ipa-server-selinux-2.0.0-23.el6.i686


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create nested group: grp2 is member of grp1
2. let user21 and user22 is direct member of grp2, and user11 and user12 is direct member of grp1
3. when check user list for grp1, we can see all 4 users: user11, user12, user21, user22 are listed
4. now delete user11 and user22 from grp1
5. go back to same user list page for grp1, there is no user listed at all.
  
Expected results:
I expect the user listing behave is consistent: if we decide to show indirect member, then regardless if there is direct member, we should always show indirect member. Vise versa. 

Additional info:

Comment 2 Rob Crittenden 2011-06-16 15:03:57 UTC

Please retest using a daily build

Comment 3 Jenny Severance 2011-06-24 15:15:26 UTC

I am not seeing any issues with displaying direct and/or indirect members with the newest build, but I would like Yi to take a look as I am not exactly sure of the scenario he was testing.

Comment 4 Dmitri Pal 2011-06-27 22:52:48 UTC

Any update?

Comment 5 Yi Zhang 2011-07-19 17:23:32 UTC

my bug report based on the 6.1 release. And I don't see the same issue on the daily build. This bug can be closed as verified

Comment 6 Rob Crittenden 2011-10-31 20:06:29 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Do not document

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 18:34:02 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1533.html