Bug 715089

Summary: Grey dots in djvu files
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Alexander Ovcharenko <sarulezzz>
Component: djvulibreAssignee: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 17CC: lepennec, viktor.kolchenko, yeloon
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-17 19:55:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot of djvu none

Description Alexander Ovcharenko 2011-06-21 20:15:43 UTC
Created attachment 505884 [details]
Screenshot of djvu

Description of problem:
When I open djvu file in djview (or in evince) there are grey dots on the image of document. See screenshot in the attachment.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
djvulibre-libs-3.5.22-2.fc15
djvulibre-3.5.22-2.fc15

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download djvu file (for example http://djvu.org/docs/superhero.djvu )
2. Open it with djview
  
Actual results:
There are many grey dots on the image of document

Expected results:
There is no grey dots on the image of document

Comment 1 Erwan LE PENNEC 2011-11-26 16:30:14 UTC
The same issue was present in fedora 16. Simply recompiling the package for the src.rpm solves the issue for me.

Comment 2 Erwan LE PENNEC 2011-11-26 16:40:19 UTC
for=from in the previous comment...

Comment 3 Rakesh Pandit 2011-11-28 04:18:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The same issue was present in fedora 16. Simply recompiling the package for the
> src.rpm solves the issue for me.

I will have a look in a day or two. Thanks.

Regards,

Comment 4 Rakesh Pandit 2011-11-28 05:46:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The same issue was present in fedora 16. Simply recompiling the package for the
> src.rpm solves the issue for me.

Which package you recompiled to fix the issue ?

I cannot reproduce it. Can you reproduce this issue always ?

Comment 5 Erwan LE PENNEC 2011-11-28 13:33:37 UTC
Please note that I am using the updates-testing repository... Maybe the issue is not here without this.

Nevertheless, I have the dot issue for every djvu file with the official djvulibre package djvulibre-3.5.24-1. It is visible with djview4 of with the djvups command line. Playing with the view->display menu shows that only the stencil is displayed properly.

Recompiling the djvulibre package from its source with rpmbuid -ba djvulibre yields a functioning djvulibre package.

Please feel free to ask for mode details.

Comment 6 Alexander Ovcharenko 2011-11-28 13:53:11 UTC
I also have this issue in F16. But I don't use updates-testing.

Comment 7 Viktor Kolchenko 2011-12-17 10:52:54 UTC
I confirm the issue exists in Fedora 16. djvulibre-3.5.24-1.fc16. I don't use updates-testing repository.

Comment 8 Krzysztof Jelinski 2012-02-02 14:08:43 UTC
I have the same problem. Im not using updates-testing. 
Packages:
djvulibre-libs-3.5.24-1.fc16.i686
djvulibre-3.5.24-1.fc16.i686

Comment 9 Fedora End Of Life 2013-01-17 00:14:11 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '16'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on 
"Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 10 Alexander Ovcharenko 2013-01-17 19:55:22 UTC
I don't have the problem in F17.