| Summary: | RFE: check for minimum RAM available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Karel Volný <kvolny> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Will Woods <wwoods> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | amit.shah, berrange, dwmw2, ehabkost, gcosta, itamar, jaswinder, jforbes, jonathan, knoel, markmc, ondrejj, scottt.tw, vanmeeuwen+fedora, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-23 14:10:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Karel Volný
2011-06-23 11:50:45 UTC
shame on me, I've missed that I need 640 MiB RAM (oh my ...) http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_15.html#sect-Release_Notes-Hardware_Overview anyway, hard freeze instead of properly reported error is bad behaviour so turning this into RFE This is way too early for anaconda to do any sort of check - it's still the kernel setting the environment up. We are, however, working on making things fit into memory better. (In reply to comment #2) > This is way too early for anaconda to do any sort of check - it's still the > kernel setting the environment up. then let's pass this to kernel ... it should report some sort of "out of memory" message instead of just hanging (or what does it do?) It panics, with a trace that starts: [ 2.546782] Call Trace: [ 2.547107] [<ffffffff81467a3a>] ? panic+0x91/0x19c [ 2.547674] [<ffffffff810daf85>] ? out_of_memory+0x2e2/0x378 Which seems pretty clear to me, but there's some proposed patches to make this clearer in bug 680542. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 680542 *** (In reply to comment #4) > It panics, with a trace that starts: > [ 2.546782] Call Trace: > [ 2.547107] [<ffffffff81467a3a>] ? panic+0x91/0x19c > [ 2.547674] [<ffffffff810daf85>] ? out_of_memory+0x2e2/0x378 hm, this hasn't happened on my system - at least not within reasonable timeframe (i.e. tenths of minutes) |