Bug 716260

Summary: cached exchange reference can cause cluster inconsistencies if exchange is deleted/recreated
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG Reporter: Mike Cressman <mcressma>
Component: qpid-cppAssignee: messaging-bugs <messaging-bugs>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Petr Matousek <pematous>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1.3CC: aconway, freznice, gsim, iboverma, jross, pematous, tross
Target Milestone: 1.3.3   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: qpid-cpp-mrg-0.7.946106-33 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 696655 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-10 17:21:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 696655    
Bug Blocks: 703724    

Comment 1 Petr Matousek 2011-07-20 14:29:35 UTC 
This issue has been fixed.

Verified on RHEL5.7 architectures: i386, x86_64

packages installed:
python-qpid-0.7.946106-15.el5
qpid-cpp-client-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-client-devel-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-client-devel-docs-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-cluster-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-devel-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-store-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-cpp-server-xml-0.7.946106-33.el5
qpid-java-client-0.10-6.el5
qpid-java-common-0.10-6.el5
qpid-java-example-0.10-6.el5
qpid-tools-0.7.946106-12.el5
rh-qpid-cpp-tests-0.7.946106-33.el5

-> VERIFIED
Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2011-08-10 17:21:24 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1147.html