Bug 716516

Summary: CPUScaling test is failing with Intel Westmere E7-4870 CPUs
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Benigno Guinto <ben.guinto>
Component: Test Suite (tests)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: David Aquilina <dwa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0CC: flanagan, gregg.shick, rlandry, shawn.pagan, ykun
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-17 16:19:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Cpuscaling hardware log
none
Cpuscaling output log
none
Cpuscaling system log none

Description Benigno Guinto 2011-06-24 17:59:57 UTC
Created attachment 509824 [details]
Cpuscaling hardware log

Description of problem:
CPUScaling test is failing on Intel Westmere E7-4870 CPUs. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
V7-1.3-46.e16.src.rpm

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RH6.0 on DL980 G7 with Intel E7-4870 CPUs
2. Install RH6.0 Certification suite from V7-1.3-46.e16.src.rpm
3. Run Cpuscaling test
  
Actual results:
Test Fails

Expected results:
Test to pass

Additional info:
There are 8 sockets and 80 physical cores / 160 Logical CPUs in our Test configuration.  We also tried the Cpuscaling tests from an earlier version, v7-1.3-35.el6.src.rpm, and it failed also.

Comment 1 Benigno Guinto 2011-06-24 18:01:04 UTC
Created attachment 509825 [details]
Cpuscaling output log

Comment 2 Benigno Guinto 2011-06-24 18:01:43 UTC
Created attachment 509826 [details]
Cpuscaling system log

Comment 3 Benigno Guinto 2011-06-24 18:36:09 UTC
We also certified RH5.5 on the same system, same configuration and cpuscaling passed: Bugzilla 716521.

Comment 6 David Aquilina 2011-08-17 16:19:43 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 699653 ***