Bug 716782

Summary:	RFE: Ability to group projects in a Zanata instance
Product:	[Retired] Zanata	Reporter:	Jared MORGAN <jmorgan>
Component:	Usability	Assignee:	Runa Bhattacharjee <runab>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Ding-Yi Chen <dchen>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	unspecified	CC:	ankit, mmurray, sflaniga, zanata-bugs
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Improvement
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-04-17 06:33:47 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	742111
Bug Blocks:

Description Jared MORGAN 2011-06-27 04:36:13 UTC

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.100 Safari/534.30

There does not seem to be a way of sorting the names of the projects in Zanata currently. It would make sorting much easier if there was.

I'm also wondering if there might be a way of grouping projects under a product group.

For example, JBoss EAP is currently growing on translate.jboss.org. It would be good to sort all related projects under one main heading (similar to how docs-stage currently groups projects). This would also remove the need to prefix all books with JBoss EAP in the project title.



Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Alex Eng 2011-10-14 03:43:10 UTC

Project sorting resolved in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742111

Comment 2 Ding-Yi Chen 2011-12-02 04:28:28 UTC

Jared,
As Bug 746859  describe, Zanata-1.4.1 and early is actually sort by id, not by project name. This is fixed in 1.4.2.

Yet, the project grouping is not yet implemented.

Comment 3 Sean Flanigan 2012-04-17 06:33:47 UTC

Project grouping will now be tracked in bug 800869.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 800869 ***