| Summary: | Recommended swap space is not clear | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Robert Tidwell <rtidwell> |
| Component: | doc-Installation_Guide | Assignee: | Jack Reed <jreed> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | bugzilla-redhat, jreed, jskeoch, pbokoc, rdassen, rprice, wnefal+redhatbugzilla |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Documentation |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-09 02:23:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Deadline: | 2011-09-02 | ||
|
Description
Robert Tidwell
2011-07-01 14:25:20 UTC
*** Bug 727568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi, I think the values in the table 9.2 is much more sane and better suited for machines with huge amount of mem than the defaults in anaconda. If you have a machine with 96GB ram and you don't use oracle, but something like virtualization 98GB of Swap is not help full. 16GB of Swap is much better suited for "normal" usage. I think this should be an anaconda bug and not a doc bug, code for that can be found in Bug 727568. Page 96 is correct and Page 375 and anaconda is wrong. Greeting Jens Kühnel Hi Jens, Thanks for your feedback. The documentation changes made in response to this bug now accurately reflect the swap space errors raised in the original report. However, if you would like to address these values as they now stand, please feel free to open a new bug against Anaconda itself. If changes are made as a result of this, we will ensure that the documentation reflects them. Thanks again, Jack Hi Jack, I did that, see Bug 727568. But I was closed as duplicated. CU Jens Hi, I still think it is a error to change the documentation that is correct instead of changing the code that is wrong. How wrong? There is even a KB 15252 which tells you exactly as I feel. Please accept that sometime code is wrong and docs are right. Please don't break the sane docs, instead of fixing the code. Greetings Jens Kühnel |