Bug 719881

Summary: Incorrect URL in the package metadata
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Radek Bíba <rbiba>
Component: tokyocabinetAssignee: Marek Skalický <mskalick>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.1CC: databases-maint, hhorak, ovasik, psklenar, tlavigne
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FastFix, Patch, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-31 06:54:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 947782, 1159825    

Description Radek Bíba 2011-07-08 09:30:15 UTC
Description of problem:
The tokyocabinet rpm matadata reads:
URL         : http://1978th.net/tokyocabinet/

However, this domain doesn't exist; I'm redirected to http://www.iana.org/domains/example/

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tokyocabinet-1.4.33-6.el6

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install tokyocabinet
2. rpm -qi tokyocabinet
3. follow the URL of the project

Actual results:
Error

Expected results:
The project web site

Additional info:
Should the URL be http://fallabs.com/tokyocabinet/ ?

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-08 09:38:23 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 3 Honza Horak 2012-05-03 07:08:42 UTC
This is fixed in Fedora Rawhide and I think it's not worth fixing even in fastrack. However, if anybody has the opposite point of view, feel free to re-open.

Comment 4 Radek Bíba 2012-05-03 07:19:29 UTC
Thanks, that's fine with me. Maybe we could reopen this bug when (if) this package is updated in RHEL 6 and fix it together with the other bug(s).

Comment 5 Honza Horak 2012-05-03 08:40:03 UTC
That's true, so I'll keep it open just for tracking, but will not propose it for fastrack.