Bug 720680

Summary:	Tasks Executed doesn't include page info in pagination links
Product:	[Retired] Beaker	Reporter:	Chris Ward <cward>
Component:	web UI	Assignee:	Raymond Mancy <rmancy>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	0.6	CC:	bpeck, dcallagh, ebaak, jingwang, llim, mcsontos, rmancy, stl
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	UX
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-07-02 23:12:08 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Chris Ward 2011-07-12 13:22:19 UTC

Description of problem:

On executed Tasks page, after doing a search that results in more than "1 page" (?) worth of results, 

1) it's really difficult to notice the '< << >> >' pagination links
2) one has no idea how many results there are, how many results are shown per page, how many pages more they'll be scrolling, or what page they're on.

Expected results:

Pagination would include those items i see missing in 2).

Comment 1 Chris Ward 2011-07-12 13:27:53 UTC

It'd be nice too if 
A) '> >>' was replaced (or complemented by) some plain English words like 'next' and 'last'. It's not always entirely obvious what those little signs mean

B) pagination links where available at the bottom of the list too, so i don't have to scroll all the way back up top to go to the next page.

:)

Comment 3 Chris Ward 2013-07-02 13:41:58 UTC

FYI I don't know if this is a current request anymore; i haven't really used beaker for a while. Feel free to close this if no one else is interested

Comment 4 Raymond Mancy 2013-07-02 23:12:08 UTC

This doesn't seem to be really important to current users, given the length of time its been open without comment.

Closing, as we are trying to not invest too much in beaker's UI going forward, and a small cosmetic change like this is not a priority.