| Summary: | flim file clashes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andreas Schwab <schwab> |
| Component: | flim | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | michel, mnewsome, petersen, tagoh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | flim-1.14.9-4.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-17 08:23:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Andreas Schwab
2011-07-14 14:44:18 UTC
Thanks for the report. Yes I noticed these shadows long ago too but didn't really know what to do for them. Can I ask what you use flim for? The only package that seems to use it now in Fedora is emacs-w3m. I tried running emacs-w3m without the above files (I don't think it actually uses any of those libraries) and basic browsing seems to work fine. AFAICS w3m-el only needs flim for mime support (I guess for rendering and editting html email, etc). Perhaps the files in question could be subpackaged or even removed. I don't have any good idea how to fix this or time to do the testing needed before removing the files. I think we will just have to live with this duplication or not install flim... Just remove them. They are not identical files AFAICR. How do you use flim? I don't want to be forced to use obsolete versions of these files. (I don't think I was clear: the point is I believe the files are not obsolete but long forked or diverged, and they don't look compatible with the shadowed files IIRC.) Anyway I am going to try to remove the said files from f17 and let's see if anything actually breaks... Here are the results again for current F17: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/md4 hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/md4 /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/hex-util hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/hex-util /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/sasl-cram hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/sasl-cram /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/sasl-digest hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/sasl-digest /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/ntlm hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/ntlm /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/sasl hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/sasl /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/sasl-ntlm hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/sasl-ntlm /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/hmac-def hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/hmac-def /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/flim/hmac-md5 hides /usr/share/emacs/24.0.92/lisp/net/hmac-md5 (Perhaps it would actually be better if site-lisp/flim was behind 24.0.92/lisp/* in load-path.) Anyway should be "fixed" in flim-1.14.9-4.fc17. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=297131 Could you please test it? Actually I'm not an user of shimbun feature in w3m-el and I'm not sure if I did correct thing for this testing though, just tried to read some articles through it on Gnus, what matching md5 in the emacs lisp. that looks good so far. > Actually I'm not an user of shimbun feature in w3m-el and I'm not sure if I did
> correct thing for this testing though, just tried to read some articles through
> it on Gnus, what matching md5 in the emacs lisp. that looks good so far.
Ok thanks for testing.
I guess I will close this then and probably won't backport to f16.
|