| Summary: | Unnecessary dependency on java-1.5.0-gcj ? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
| Component: | postgresql-jdbc | Assignee: | Tom Lane <tgl> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | hhorak, tgl |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | postgresql-jdbc-9.0.801-3.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-07-17 20:57:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Hans de Goede
2011-07-14 18:06:30 UTC
Yeah, the specfile is still defaulting to a gcj build, but that's a legacy choice for sure. However, the non-gcj build path hasn't been tested in a *long* time. Would you be willing to try a build with _gcj_support set to 0, and see if it (a) works and (b) has the dependencies you expect? I'm not in a very good position to test this myself. (In reply to comment #1) > Yeah, the specfile is still defaulting to a gcj build, but that's a legacy > choice for sure. However, the non-gcj build path hasn't been tested in a > *long* time. Would you be willing to try a build with _gcj_support set to 0, > and see if it (a) works Works as in builds, or works as in actually use the postgresql-jdbc binding? I can do the build checking, but I don't see myself actually testing the database functionality... Regards, Hans |