Bug 723765
Summary: | VLAN, with custom MAC, on igb broken since 2.6.18-238 (5.6) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | David Herselman <bbs2web> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Stefan Assmann <sassmann> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Network QE <network-qe> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 5.6 | CC: | arozansk, ccui, haliu, wpan |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-08-31 14:04:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Herselman
2011-07-21 04:39:19 UTC
Hashing out the MACADDR line provides a working VLAN on 2.6.18-238+. We need each VLAN interface to have a unique MAC address though as we establish multiple PPPoE sessions and additionally interface with different networks on layer 3 switches. please try kernel-2.6.18-279.el5.sassmann_bug723765_01 from http://people.redhat.com/sassmann/kernel/ This kernel works perfectly, many thanks! Will this be committed back in to the main kernel? This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. A fix should make it into the next update. I think this bug is the same with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698928, and it have been fixed in kernel-2.6.18-283.el5. git commit e9f56def58b3c85e161d38782bfceb0ac31662ad Yep, this is definitely a dupe. Already have a patch for it included in 283.el5 and newer: http://people.redhat.com/~jwilson/el5/ *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 698928 *** |