Bug 724225 (BRMS-169)

Summary:	Problems with persistence of processes
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5	Reporter:	nwallace <nwallace>
Component:	unspecified	Assignee:	Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	5.0.1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRMS-169
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-01 12:24:13 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description nwallace 2009-07-07 14:32:22 UTC

Date of First Response: 2009-09-10 01:12:33
securitylevel_name: Public

Unmarshalling of persisted process instances containing variables failing.
Marshalling / unmarshalling or process instances as part of the session also does not use the pluggable process instance marshallers.
Working memory on unmarshalled process instances not set correctly.

Comment 1 nwallace 2009-07-07 14:33:36 UTC

Link: Added: This issue is related to JBRULES-2042

Comment 2 nwallace 2009-09-01 12:24:13 UTC

Fix in place.

Comment 3 David Le Sage 2009-09-10 05:12:33 UTC

For documenting this in the Release Notes, can you please confirm the following and fill in the missing information. Dot point explanations are fine:

The CAUSE (what was actually broken)
 *  Processes were persisting in working memory after  being unmarshalled.
 * Working memory was not being set correctly and "pluggable process instance marshallers" were not being used.

CONSEQUENCES of the bug (how it impacts users.)
 * 

The FIX (what was changed to eliminate this bug) and 
 *

RESULTS of the fix (what now happens for users.)
 *

Comment 4 David Le Sage 2009-09-23 05:37:09 UTC

We are still awaiting the outstanding information for the Release Notes on this one.  Please provide it as soon as possible. Thanks.

Comment 5 Kris Verlaenen 2009-09-23 13:00:55 UTC

Not sure this should be included, as it is part of unsupported features, but ...

The CAUSE (what was actually broken)
 * Various issues when using the process instance marshallers

CONSEQUENCES of the bug (how it impacts users.)
 * Persistence of running process instances was incorrect

The FIX (what was changed to eliminate this bug) and
 * Various fixes to make sure the process instances are correctly marshalled and unmarshalled

RESULTS of the fix (what now happens for users.)
 * Persistence of process instances should work correctly now.

Comment 6 David Le Sage 2009-10-01 00:57:10 UTC

NOTE:  Inclusion of this in the release notes relies on confirmation as to whether it is in or not.

Comment 7 Dana Mison 2009-10-05 08:58:09 UTC

added to the 5.0.CP01 release notes as resolved:

JBRULES-2042
Processes were persisting in working memory after being unmarshalled.  Working memory was not being set correctly and "pluggable process instance marshallers" were not being used.