Bug 724264 (BRMS-209)

Summary: Swimlanes available in rules flow interface (Eclipse)
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: Eric D. Schabell <erics>
Component: Tooling (JBDS)Assignee: Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0.0 GA   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRMS-209
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
fedora 10, JBoss DevStudio 2.0.0.GA, x86_64
Last Closed: 2011-04-21 23:24:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot-Drools-rulesflow-swimlanes.png none

Description Eric D. Schabell 2009-07-30 20:16:46 UTC
securitylevel_name: Public

Will attach screenshot, but the rules flow interface for a flow shows Swimlanes in the properties tab of the JBoss DevelStudio, when there is absolutely no way to assign/define a task in a flow. I would expect that this did not get removed when productizing this for JBoss BRMS release?

Comment 1 Eric D. Schabell 2009-07-30 20:17:37 UTC
Screenshot showing the Swimlanes.

Comment 2 Eric D. Schabell 2009-07-30 20:17:37 UTC
Attachment: Added: Screenshot-Drools-rulesflow-swimlanes.png


Comment 3 John Graham 2010-09-10 18:48:05 UTC
Kris: Is this still the case in D5.1? If not please close, otherwise (if valid) set target to "future".

Comment 4 Kris Verlaenen 2010-09-14 00:41:06 UTC
You can assign human tasks to swimlanes simply by specifying which swimlane they should belong to as the value of the swimlane property.  The productization removes a few of the node types from the default palette.  The user however can always customize the editor to select which nodes should be allowed, including the human task node.  This filtering only works on a node level, so it is not possible to remove/filter one specific property only at this point.

Comment 5 Kris Verlaenen 2011-04-21 23:24:33 UTC
Won't fix this as part of this editor, will be supported in the new editor