| Summary: | QE: BRMS 5.0.2 Release Notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 | Reporter: | Len DiMaggio <ldimaggi> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Dana Mison <dmison> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 5.0.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.0.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRMS-297 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-09-03 14:19:22 UTC | Type: | Task |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 724326 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Len DiMaggio
2010-04-07 17:30:22 UTC
Document is here: http://downtown.englab.bne.redhat.com/drafts/JBoss_Enterprise_BRMS_Platform/5.0.2/Release_Notes/ Darrin - is the doc ready for review? Comments:
Section: 4. Supported Deployment Platforms
Supported Java Virtual Machines (JVM)
* Sun JDK 1.5
* Sun JDK 1.6
Comment: This list may change. Waiting on a PM decision as RHEL dropped Sun 1.5 on March 31
---------------------------------
Supported Browsers
* Firefox 3
* Internet Explorer 7
* Internet Explorer 6
* Safari 3
Comment: This list needs to be expanded to also include IE8 and Safari 4
---------------------------------
Section: 7. Possible Migration Issue
Need to change the wording:
Client applications built using the JBoss Rules engine libraries from the 5.0.1 and later releases are unable to user resources being server from a JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5.0.0 server.
Should read "use" not "user."
---------------------------------
Section: 8. Issues resolved in the 5.0.2 release
The sequence of the JIRAs listed in this section seem to be random. Can the JIRAs be listed in numerical order?
Link: Added: This issue depends BRMS-271 updated. The JIRAs are sorted by their project JIRAs, the highlighted product JIRA numbers will be removed prior to publication be handy if I actually set this issue to resolved wouldn't it ? ;-) updated |