Bug 724447 (BRMS-392)

Summary: Test Scenario: Missing input field after inserting more Facts in the GIVEN section
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: Jiri Locker <jlocker>
Component: User InterfaceAssignee: Nobody <nobody>
Status: VERIFIED --- QA Contact: Jiri Locker <jlocker>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.1.0.ER1, 5.1.0.ER2, 5.1.0.ER3, 5.1.0.ER4CC: atangrin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: BRMS 5.2.0.GA   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/BRMS-392
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
After inserting multiple facts into the given section of a test scenario the input fields were missing. The Drools component has been upgraded to 5.2 and the error no longer presents.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
TestScenario_NOK.png
none
TestScenario_OK.png none

Description Jiri Locker 2010-10-15 23:46:02 UTC 
Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a Test Scenario
2. insert a new Fact of type 'A' with a name 'a'
3. add any field to the inserted Fact
4. insert another fact of the same type 'A' with a name 'b'
Workaround: Workaround Exists
Workaround Description: Remove the field row that is missing input elements and add the Fact's field again, the inputs will appear in all columns (for each inserted Fact). + Re-type all the values that had been filled in before re-adding the field row (to get to the original state, for completeness).
securitylevel_name: Public

Follow the steps to reproduce, you end up with a new Fact column which field values cannot be filled in because the input elements are missing. This can be fixed by following the workaround description, but can be very annoying when you have a larger number of facts already set up and decide to add one more. By re-adding the field row you loose all the filled in data and would have to re-type it all.
Comment 1 Jiri Locker 2010-10-15 23:48:09 UTC 
Attachment: Added: TestScenario_NOK.png
Attachment: Added: TestScenario_OK.png
Comment 2 Jiri Locker 2011-04-27 14:11:57 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends GUVNOR-1139
Comment 3 Anne-Louise Tangring 2011-05-31 18:56:22 UTC 
This should be part of Drools 5.2 already.
Comment 4 lcarlon 2011-08-30 04:48:11 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724447

After inserting multiple faves into the given section of a test scenario the input fields were missing. The Drools component has been upgraded to 5.2 and the error no longer presents.
Comment 5 lcarlon 2011-09-14 04:30:26 UTC 
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724447
-
 After inserting multiple faves into the given section of a test scenario the input fields were missing. The Drools component has been upgraded to 5.2 and the error no longer presents.
Comment 6 lcarlon 2011-10-05 05:25:01 UTC 
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-After inserting multiple faves into the given section of a test scenario the input fields were missing. The Drools component has been upgraded to 5.2 and the error no longer presents.+After inserting multiple facts into the given section of a test scenario the input fields were missing. The Drools component has been upgraded to 5.2 and the error no longer presents.