Bug 724673 (JBWFK-55)

Summary: Unable to edit text inside of RichTextArea element in GWT Showcase 2.1.1 example
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise WFK Platform 1 Reporter: Martin Hanus <mhanus>
Component: GWTAssignee: mark yarborough <myarboro>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Karel Piwko <kpiwko>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1.2.0.ER02CC: kpiwko, rnewton
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWFK-55
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 803782 (view as bug list) Environment:
EAP 5.1, WFK 1.2
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 803782    

Description Martin Hanus 2011-03-16 11:31:37 UTC
securitylevel_name: Public

All devices failed to activate and write text into RichTextArea element. Devices treated text area as uneditable space no different from surrounding page's background. On the other hand, element's toolbar seemed to work fine, buttons and select boxes are reacting correctly.
(Simple TextArea element works without problems)

Example tested on mobile devices: iPad, iPhone 4, Google Nexus S.

Comment 1 Ondrej Skutka 2011-05-09 11:38:35 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is incorporated by JBWFK-17


Comment 2 Rebecca Newton 2011-05-23 06:03:36 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Documented as Known Issue
Release Notes Text: Added: iPad, iPhone 4, and Google Nexus S fail to activate and write text into RichTextArea element. The devices treated the text area as uneditable space. There are no reported problems with the element's toolbar, buttons, or select boxes.


Comment 3 Rebecca Newton 2012-03-09 06:07:14 UTC
Is this still relevant to WFK 2.0.0?

Comment 4 Karel Piwko 2012-03-15 15:34:51 UTC
Pavol, can you verify if this is still present in WFK 2.0? I guess both RF 3.3 and 4.2 would be in place for verification.

Comment 5 Pavol Pitonak 2012-03-15 16:02:00 UTC
This issue is not related to RichFaces.

Comment 6 Karel Piwko 2012-03-15 16:05:45 UTC
Bec, yes, this is still valid, cloned into WFK 2 project.