Bug 726074

Summary:	Eye of GNOME does not recognize SVGZ files
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bartosz Brachaczek <b.brachaczek>
Component:	eog	Assignee:	Siddhesh Poyarekar <spoyarek>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	15	CC:	eliasen, friemann, kalevlember, mnewsome, spoyarek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-04-27 07:14:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Bartosz Brachaczek 2011-07-27 13:11:24 UTC

Description of problem:
When I double-clik on an SVGZ file in Nautilus, it opens Eye of GNOME to display it. Though, Eye of GNOME fails and tells me it does not recognize the image format. Uncompressed SVG works just good. Firstly I reported it to GNOME (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655377). It turned out that native support for SVGZ was indeed missing but a developer told me it should still displayer using GdkPixbuf. And indeed when I tried Eye of GNOME 2.32.1 on my Gentoo installation, it was able to show SVGZ files.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.0.1

Expected results:
SVGZ files are recognized correctly. If it was anything to do with upstream, the bug is also fixed or at least reported upstream.

Comment 1 Felix Riemann 2011-08-03 16:01:35 UTC

To me it looks like F15's librsvg2 build is missing an upstream fix[1] to get the SVGZ support in the pixbuf loader working again. The output of gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders shows that the SVG loader doesn't report the SVGZ mimetype.

[1]: http://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/commit/?h=gnome-2-32&id=a243be19bd97579dfebdac8d6154d34b2c938531

Comment 2 Bartosz Brachaczek 2011-08-11 21:48:52 UTC

Yes, it is very likely.

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2012-04-27 07:14:19 UTC

Hi,

Thanks for reporting this. Confirmed fixed as of Fedora 17, at least.

Comment 4 Alan Eliasen 2017-09-13 08:03:42 UTC

This is still a problem in FC26.