| Summary: | BRMS jars improperly named | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 | Reporter: | Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> |
| Component: | Build Process | Assignee: | Ryan Zhang <rzhang> |
| Status: | VERIFIED --- | QA Contact: | Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | BRMS 5.2.0-ER1 | CC: | atangrin |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | BRMS 5.2.0.GA | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Lukáš Petrovický
2011-07-29 07:33:33 UTC
This would be easy to fix. Just to want to confirm, we have added "-ER2" ... suffix in the drools jars version in order to avoiding version overlapping in MEAD env. So the "-ER/CR“ suffix shall be ok , right? I think that should be no problem at all. Also please make sure that the jBPM JARs have a proper suffix. (Currently they're suffixed with "SOA".) So far it looks good. I will wait for final verification once we get the CR bits. Just noticed that even with ER3, jBPM still has the "5.1.0" suffix - I think this needs to be changed to 5.2.0. OK, I would update jbpm to 5.2.0.BRMS too in next release. I had thought that it would be wise to follow the project's major version number. Verified in ER4 |