Bug 727322

Summary:	rhevm_deltacloud_username and rhevm provider username use different formats
Product:	[Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine	Reporter:	james labocki <jlabocki>
Component:	aeolus-conductor	Assignee:	Richard Su <rwsu>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	0.3.0	CC:	akarol, dajohnso, deltacloud-maint, ssachdev
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-05-15 21:52:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description james labocki 2011-08-01 19:49:34 UTC

Description of problem:
rhevm_deltacloud_username and rhevm provider username in aeolus-conductor UI use different formats.

in /etc/aeolus-configure/nodes/default_configure the format of rhevm_deltacloud_username is username@DOMAIN, while admin as https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/projects/aeolus/wiki/RHEV-M_Setup mentioned (no .com). However, when adding a provider account in aeolus-conductor interface the format is username.

In Summary:

/etc/aeolus-configure/nodes/default_configure
rhevm_deltacloud_username: username@DOMAIN

aeolus-conductor provider account setup
username: username

This is confusing. It might make sense to document the difference in format really well or just adopt one over the other throughout both projects to make it easier on the end user.

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2011-08-17 13:56:22 UTC

QE agrees

Comment 2 Richard Su 2011-09-12 23:39:52 UTC

Format is the same. Updated wiki page.

Comment 3 Aziza Karol 2011-09-20 10:36:38 UTC

/etc/aeolus-configure/nodes/rhevm
#  rhevm_deltacloud_username: username@fqdn

aeolus-conductor provider account setup
username: username@fqdn

(ie with FQDN, like admin)

wiki page is updated 
https://www.aeolusproject.org/redmine/projects/aeolus/wiki/RHEV-M_Setup

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-15 21:52:27 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html