Bug 727569

Summary: abrt-server and abrt-install-ccpp-hook do not have a manpages
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Michal Nowak <mnowak>
Component: abrtAssignee: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: ahecox, dhoward, dvlasenk, gavin, kklic, mnowak, npajkovs, ohudlick, rvokal
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: abrt-2.0.4-8.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 12:16:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Michal Nowak 2011-08-02 13:37:31 UTC
Description of problem:

Executable /usr/sbin/abrt-server and /usr/sbin/abrt-install-ccpp-hook do not have a manpages.

Every binary which user might use should have a man page. If you feel mentioned binaries should not be executed by user, what about moving them to /usr/libexec/ as is the case for `abrt-hook-ccpp'?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

abrt 2.0.4

Comment 2 Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-08-25 15:56:13 UTC
commit bfa2b9f90daaec7f2a15e492909baedbc975426c
Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>
Date:   Thu Aug 25 17:44:39 2011 +0200

    man page for abrt-install-ccpp-hook
    
    Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>

commit 0fe17e5c8ff7ceedd6f70e4a53a759413dba138d
Author: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>
Date:   Thu Aug 25 16:48:35 2011 +0200

    man page for abrt-server
    
    Signed-off-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 12:16:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1598.html