Bug 727947
Summary: | Changing a Guest VM Console between SPICE and VNC Causes Change in Virtual NIC | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | John Brier <jbrier> |
Component: | qemu-kvm | Assignee: | Virtualization Maintenance <virt-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | emcnabb, juzhang, mkalinin, mkenneth, tburke, virt-maint |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-09-22 08:22:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John Brier
2011-08-03 18:32:08 UTC
I talked to Dan Yasny and he said he had opened a bug on this in SolidICE time frame 3 years ago but couldn't find it. It was probably closed WONTFIX he assumed. He said this should be an RFE. I should mention this was seen with RHEV H 5.7, we have not tried this on RHEL 6 but I assume it can't be implemented within RHEL 5 timeframe which is why I opened it under RHEL 6 ugh, I had a mid air collision with pm-rhel on some flags it was adding at the same time i put in my last comment and I just submitted mine anyway w/o realizing i could submit just the comment. can someone check the flags and everything and fix them as needed? sorry. It's not a bug - qemu is not invoked with static pci addresses so using qxl or cirrus makes the pci ordering effect other devices. It is possible to add this to the command line to make the problem go away. Dor I think I see what you're saying. qemu just does what it's told so the problem is coming from vdsm or libvirt not keeping the order consistent. Dan said this problem is also seen sometimes with adding multiple displays to a windows guest. For the customer story I put in comment #1 what would be the best way to get this behavior corrected? what about an RFE to always have consistent PCI addressing when adding/removing devices? or if it is a bug would it be a bug in vdsm or libvirt? can someone respond to comment #7 == For the customer story I put in comment #1 what would be the best way to get this behavior corrected? what about an RFE to always have consistent PCI addressing when adding/removing devices? or if it is a bug would it be a bug in vdsm or libvirt? == For anyone interested, I opened an RFE on this because I couldn't find an existing one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745274 |