Bug 728713

Summary: [abrt] brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Charles Thomas <CharlesRThomasJr>
Component: braseroAssignee: Xavier Lamien <lxtnow>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: lxtnow
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:0a9a9e130f2ff690e055f40ca023baa38d4c39d0
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-21 17:33:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Charles Thomas 2011-08-06 17:33:22 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.18
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 30207 bytes
cmdline: brasero computer:///CD%5CDVD%20Drive.drive
component: brasero
Attached file: coredump, 40222720 bytes
crash_function: brasero_data_vfs_loading_node_result
executable: /usr/bin/brasero
kernel: 2.6.35.13-92.fc14.i686.PAE
package: brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/brasero was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1312651904
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. testing out brasero on new fedora 14 install
2.
3.
Comment 1 Charles Thomas 2011-08-06 17:33:24 UTC 
Created attachment 516999 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Charles Thomas 2011-08-06 20:02:45 UTC 
Package: brasero-2.32.0-1.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. testing out brasero on new fedora 14 install
2.
3.
Comment 3 abrt-bot 2012-03-21 17:33:23 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #716981, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #572250, bug #587479, bug #611081, bug #620942, bug #671999, bug #697564, bug #714513, bug #716981

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 716981 ***