| Summary: | kexec fails to load crash kernel with crashkernel>=1024M | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Martin Wilck <martin.wilck> | ||||
| Component: | kexec-tools | Assignee: | Cong Wang <amwang> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Caspar Zhang <czhang> | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | cye, gasmith, qcai, rkhan, vgoyal | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-08-09 03:35:46 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Martin Wilck
2011-08-08 12:29:28 UTC
Created attachment 517197 [details]
sosreport
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 608312 *** Martin, why are you trying to reserve memory at 896MB? And why are you trying to reserve 1GB of RAM for second kernel? (In reply to comment #4) > Martin, why are you trying to reserve memory at 896MB? I am not doing it. The kernel does it automatically when the crashkernel size exceeds some value between 512M and 1024M which I don't know exactly. The reason is probably the RAMDISK at 003719d000 which prevents 1G to be allocated at 32M. I suspect that loading the kdump kernel fails if and only if the offset is at 896 (but I can't prove it). > And why are you trying > to reserve 1GB of RAM for second kernel? Well, this came in from a customer who saw that the default reservation of 128M was too small (makedumpfile was killed by the OOM killer while dumping). So the customer increased the crashkernel value, and, having no further guidance, set it to 1024M in order to be "on the safe side". That turned out to be wrong, too. |