Bug 729073

Summary: SELinux prevents openvpn to set its process priority
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Simon Matter <simon.matter>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: dwalsh, mmalik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-107.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 10:10:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Simon Matter 2011-08-08 16:40:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
SELinux prevents openvpn to set its process priority when the nice parameter is used.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-54.el6_0.5

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add 'nice -7' to the openvpn server config
2. start openvpn
3.
  
Actual results:
WARNING: nice -7 failed: Operation not permitted

Expected results:
nice -7 succeeded

Additional info:
allow2audit tells me the following is required (and in fact makes things work):

----------------
module invocaopenvpn 1.0;

require {
        type openvpn_t;
        class capability sys_nice;
        class process setsched;
}

#============= openvpn_t ==============
allow openvpn_t self:capability sys_nice;
allow openvpn_t self:process setsched;
----------------

Thanks,
Simon
Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2011-08-10 07:05:07 UTC 
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-107.el6
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:10:30 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html