| Summary: | yum update syslog-ng fails | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Soichi Hayashi <soichih> |
| Component: | syslog-ng | Assignee: | Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | jose.p.oliveira.oss, mrunge, rayvd, silfreed |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-08-09 22:15:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Soichi Hayashi
2011-08-08 22:09:17 UTC
I believe you have installed, or you were trying to install, both the 32 and 64 bits version of syslog-ng (syslog-ng-2.1.4-9.el5.x86_64 vs syslog-ng-2.0.9-4.el5.i386). Could you check that you have only one arch of syslog-ng installed? And the one installed matched your kernel arch? (rpm -q syslog-ng; uname -a). /jpo I am not sure why 32 bit version of syslog-ng was installed, and I don't know why yum update all the sudden started to upgrade it to 64bit version. The real problem is that, I should be able to upgrade from 32bit to 64bit. One of our colleague has suggested that syslog-ng rpm spec file updated to include multilib parameters (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks) We've always run "yum update" without this issue, and I believe having conflicting RPM in our machine was the trigger to this issue, not the cause itself. Soichi Soichi, (In reply to comment #2) > ... > The real problem is that, I should be able to upgrade from 32bit to 64bit. > ... I don't believe this kind of migration is even recommended or supported by Red Hat (at least I never come across a Red Hat document detailing the procedure). Also, be advised that syslog-ng 2.1.4 is no longer supported by upstream. Regards, jpo (In reply to comment #2) > ... One > of our colleague has suggested that syslog-ng rpm spec file updated to include > multilib parameters > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks) May I ask why would you want to run a 32-bit version of syslog-ng in a 64-bit system? |