Bug 729243

Summary:	mesa-libGLw (libGLw.so) is available for rhel5, but same is not available for rhel6
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Santosh <sbombe>
Component:	mesa-libGLw	Assignee:	Dave Airlie <airlied>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.0	CC:	airlied, dgregor, notting, samuel.brand, syeghiay, tpelka
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 17:57:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Santosh 2011-08-09 08:39:25 UTC

Description of problem:

OpenGL applications running on RHEL6 required libGLw.so, the same supposed to be provided through mesa-libGLw 

mesa-libGLw is available for RHEl5, but same is not available for rhel6.

  
Actual results:
mesa-libGLw which provides libGLw.so is NOT available in RHEL6

Expected results:
As mesa-libGLw which provides libGLw.so is available in RHEL5, should be available for RHEL6 as well.

Additional info:

OpenGL applications has dependencies of libGLw.so on RHEL6.

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2011-08-09 09:59:47 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 17:57:00 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1714.html