Bug 729334

Summary:	[Beaker] RFE system page POC field
Product:	[Retired] Beaker	Reporter:	Jeff Burke <jburke>
Component:	web UI	Assignee:	Raymond Mancy <rmancy>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	0.6	CC:	bpeck, dcallagh, ebaak, mcsontos, mishin, pbunyan, peterm, rmancy, stl, tburke
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	MC
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-11-07 07:22:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Burke 2011-08-09 14:59:48 UTC

On the system page for kernel-hw systems we need to have a Point of contact (POC) listed. 
- This filed needs to be visible be all Beaker users not just ACL members.
- This field needs to be editable by system admins both global and local
- This field should be an individual specific email address or multiple email addresses. 

P.O.C [           ]

Please let me know if you have any comment or questions.

Thanks in advance,
Jeff

Comment 1 Jeff Burke 2011-08-09 15:06:15 UTC

The Toggle Search should also allow this field for searching

Comment 2 Dan Callaghan 2011-08-09 22:43:30 UTC

What would be the difference between "point of contact" and owner?

Comment 3 Jeff Burke 2011-08-10 03:17:42 UTC

Dan,
 We have systems in Beaker that are owned by the kernel group but are supported by a specific admin in engineering operations known as POC. Since some of these systems are unique and for development only. We would like to insure that associates know who to contact if they need any thing done with that system. The owner of these systems is ambiguous when set to admin and some admins may not know anything about the specific hardware configurations.

 We have an arrangement with engineering operations that we have a dedicated resource know as POC aka Notify CC. But since the Notify CC has been hidden I am requesting a new field that is not hidden

Regards,
Jeff

Comment 4 Dan Callaghan 2011-08-10 03:25:21 UTC

Could we just change the owner of these systems from "admin" to the specific admin who is responsible?

I'm concerned that this RFE would leave us with three different system fields (owner, notify cc, POC) with largely overlapping meanings.

Comment 5 Min Shin 2012-11-07 07:22:49 UTC

This bugs is closed as it is either not in the current Beaker scope or we could not find sufficient data in the bug report for consideration.
Please feel free to reopen the bug with additional information and/or business cases behind it.