Bug 730761

Summary:	Remove outdated reference to HA-LVM in LVM manual
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Component:	Documentation-cluster	Assignee:	Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	ecs-bugs
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.8	CC:	agk, cmarthal, jha, jskeoch, mbroz, msnitzer
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Documentation
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	728361	Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-02-27 20:27:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	728361
Bug Blocks:

Description Steven J. Levine 2011-08-15 17:01:08 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #728361 +++

Description of problem:
Section 1.4 of the LVM manual includes this information:


"If you are using a clustered system for failover where only a single node that accesses the storage is active at any one time, you should use High Availability Logical Volume Management agents (HA-LVM). For information on HA-LVM, see Configuring and Managing a Red Hat Cluster."

That document reference is out of date, and there is no information on HA-LVM in the cluster suite. At a minimum, this reference needs to be removed, and the question of where is HA-LVM documented should be addressed.

--- Additional comment from cmarthal on 2011-08-04 16:34:03 EDT ---

This reference is also in the RHEL5 LVM documentation. More importantly though, we need to find where the HA LVM administration now resides and link to that.

--- Additional comment from slevine on 2011-08-15 12:58:10 EDT ---

This information is currently on kBase, but BZ#712378 is a request to move this information into the cluster documentation -- we don't link to kbase articles from the regular documentation.

For RHEL 6.2 I have deleted the reference in my working draft, which closes this bug, but BZ#712378 remains open to address this in the long term.

I am cloning this for RHEL 5 so that I can remove the incorrect reference from that version of the document.

Comment 1 Steven J. Levine 2011-08-24 18:24:34 UTC

Re-assigning to me.

Comment 2 Steven J. Levine 2011-10-24 17:07:50 UTC

I have removed the incorrect cross-reference in my draft copy and checked the updated document into the SVN directory.