Bug 730886

Summary:	[xfs/xfstests 253] xfs_db metadump hang forever
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Eryu Guan <eguan>
Component:	xfsprogs	Assignee:	Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Branislav Náter <bnater>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.2	CC:	bnater, branto
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	xfsprogs-3.1.1-7.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	No Documentation needed (not customer reported)	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	714934	Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 14:11:01 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:	714934
Bug Blocks:

Description Eryu Guan 2011-08-16 06:23:02 UTC

Seems xfsprogs-3.1.1-6.el6 also has this problem. Clone for rhel6

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #714934 +++

Description of problem:
xfstests 253 will never complete, from the test description:
This test was created to verify fixes for problems where metadump
would never complete due to an inability to find a suitable
obfuscated name to use.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa | grep xfsprogs
xfsprogs-2.10.2-7.el5
xfsprogs-devel-2.10.2-7.el5

kernel-2.6.18-268.el5

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install xfstests
2. check 253
3.
  
Actual results:
Test will never complete

Expected results:
Test pass

Additional info:
I think this should be the xfsprogs component, if a kernel fix is needed, please correct me.

--- Additional comment from esandeen on 2011-06-21 11:07:05 EDT ---

xfsprogs is the correct component, there are upstream metadump fixes which we don't have in rhel5 and this test exercises them explicitly.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-10-07 16:12:50 UTC

Since RHEL 6.2 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 Eric Sandeen 2011-10-12 17:31:22 UTC

This is an expected failure which is fixed upstream, we will need the series starting at

56281ed43abe95e96e45d2287fd0b965b7d4d2b8 xfsprogs: metadump: some names aren't all that special

as a backport, to fix it.

Comment 10 Eric Sandeen 2012-04-25 21:08:57 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Documentation needed (not customer reported)

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 14:11:01 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0883.html