Bug 730990

Summary: kernel: X[8357]: segfault at 0000000008000f10 rip 000000000048b292 rsp 00007fff3935b700 error 4
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck>
Component: xorg-x11-serverAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7CC: gasmith
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 5.8   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 22:43:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 697498    
Attachments:
Description Flags
sosreport
none
messages file containing the segfault none

Description Martin Wilck 2011-08-16 13:43:12 UTC 
Created attachment 518489 [details]
sosreport

Description of problem:
The message 
kernel: X[8357]: segfault at 0000000008000f10 rip 000000000048b292 rsp 00007fff3935b700 error 4
was observed on a PRIMERGY CX122S1 in a load test.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.1.1-48.76.el5_6.4.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
sporadically (just once so far)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run load test
  
Actual results:
See description

Expected results:
No xorg segfault

Additional info:
I have asked the person reporting this to enable core dumps as described in 
https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-5353 and try to capture a core dump of the problem.

Please verify that the procedure in KB 5353 also applies to X!
Comment 1 Martin Wilck 2011-08-16 13:53:12 UTC 
Created attachment 518491 [details]
messages file containing the segfault

The segfault happened during reboot.
Comment 2 Martin Wilck 2011-08-19 11:59:19 UTC 
QA hasn't been able to reproduce this so far. We are internally closing it.
Comment 3 Adam Jackson 2011-12-06 22:43:02 UTC 
Closing per comment #2, please reopen if this reoccurs.