Bug 731712

Summary:	Add HekaFS (and Glusterfs)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Component:	comps	Assignee:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	16	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-08-30 18:41:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kaleb KEITHLEY 2011-08-18 12:46:46 UTC

Description of problem:

Please add hekafs to the f16 and rawhide comps.

Additional info:

I asked for feedback about adding hekafs to comps on the fedora-devel list. I got none, from which I conclude that that nobody objects.

hekafs is a cloud/clustering filesystem server based on Glusterfs. Looking at the groups in the f16 and rawhide comps I don't believe the clustering or filesystems groups are the best fit. I personally think the best fit is the servers category.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2011-08-18 16:50:11 UTC

I'm not seeing the package in the repository yet. Is 'hekafs' the right name?

Comment 2 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2011-08-18 17:20:15 UTC

hekafs is correct. It was cloudfs until last week.

Not sure what the repository is that you're referring to.

There's this https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12428

Is that what you're looking for?

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2011-08-18 19:27:26 UTC

Aha, it's been built but hasn't made its way to F-16 or updates-testing yet. No problem.

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2011-08-18 20:33:27 UTC

Honestly, I think it does fit better in filesystems, given that something like GFS is there as well. I don't see why people would look for it in servers.

Comment 5 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2011-08-19 11:45:05 UTC

filesystems is fine.

How to I push it into F16 and/or updates-testing? (I need to do the same thing for the new(est) version of glusterfs too.)

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2011-08-22 17:05:14 UTC

Oh wait, now that I'm reading this...

'filesystems' is a non-user-visible group used by anaconda. So, yeah, we need something better.

I wonder if it makes sense among a bigger cloud infrastructure group with other software that's not listed in comps right now? (OpenStack, etc.)


As to how to push updates, see:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#Working_with_packages_in_the_stable_branches

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2011-08-30 18:41:25 UTC

Added in F-17.