Bug 732475
Summary: | %postun libs not empty | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andreas Schwab <schwab> |
Component: | python | Assignee: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dmalcolm, ivazqueznet, jonathansteffan |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-08-22 19:39:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Andreas Schwab
2011-08-22 15:20:39 UTC
Thanks for reporting this. The relevant fragment of the specfile looks like this: [...begin quote...] # ====================================================== # Scriptlets # ====================================================== %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig # ====================================================== # Manifests of the various subpackages # ====================================================== %files %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc LICENSE README [...end quote...] Clearly rpm is interpreting everything leading up to the "%files" as part of the %postun. Looking in rpm-4.9.1.1/build/parseSpec.c, the relevant code that parses scriptlets is: int parseScript(rpmSpec spec, int parsePart) My reading is that it reads lines, adding them to the scriptlet, until it reaches one containing a "part token" e.g. %files (c.f. isPart() within parseSpec.c) Fix committed/pushed to git for python and python3 specfiles (I'm trying to gradually make these specfiles more easily diff-able against each other, and these comment headers were part of this). |