Bug 732478

Summary: UI incorrectly renders system package information in profile
Product: [Retired] Katello Reporter: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Jason E. Rist <jrist>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.0CC: mmccune, sghai
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-02 19:25:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
screenshot none

Description Corey Welton 2011-08-22 15:26:21 UTC
Description of problem:
After registering a system via rhsm and viewing the system package profile, the package names are all displayed as garbage.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Register a system via rhsm.
2. Systems > Registered > $system > Packages
3. View results
Actual results:
Garbled package names

Expected results:
Correct package names.

Additional info:
Not sure but if this isn't actually a backend bug. But I am not sure how to view a system profile from the CLI.  At least I /thought/ the json was getting uploaded correctly, but maybe not.

See forthcoming screenshot

Comment 1 Corey Welton 2011-08-22 15:27:21 UTC
Created attachment 519307 [details]

Comment 2 Sachin Ghai 2011-08-26 11:44:20 UTC
Same observation with following katello build:


Garbled package names are displayed only on webui. In CLI, the package list is empty..

[root@dhcp201-167 ~]# katello -u admin -p admin system packages --name=dhcp201-167.englab.pnq.redhat.com --org=ACME_Corporation
                              Package Information for System [ dhcp201-167.englab.pnq.redhat.com ] in Org [ ACME_Corporation ]

[root@dhcp201-167 ~]#

Comment 3 Mike McCune 2011-09-02 19:25:51 UTC
those are generated fake package names.  We haven't finished implementing full package profile uploading yet.