Bug 733013
Summary: | package matahari-selinux should not exists | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Branislav Náter <bnater> |
Component: | matahari | Assignee: | Andrew Beekhof <abeekhof> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | astokes, dajohnso, dwalsh, matahari-maint, mgrepl, rbryant |
Target Milestone: | alpha | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | matahari-0.4.2-9.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
No description required
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 11:40:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Branislav Náter
2011-08-24 13:10:52 UTC
Looks like we will need to obsolete matahari-selinux package. Why is this our bug? (In reply to comment #2) > Why is this our bug? @dwalsh: Don't know. mgrepl was the one who moved this from matahari to selinux-policy, so probably check with him good 2 go in v0.4.2-9 good 2 go in v0.4.2-9, moving to verified (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Why is this our bug? > > @dwalsh: Don't know. mgrepl was the one who moved this from matahari to > selinux-policy, so probably check with him Yeap, by accident. Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No description required Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1569.html |