Bug 733464

Summary:	python-2.6.6 i686 rpms not released to RHEL Server (v. 6 for 64-bit x86_64) Channel
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Brett Smith <bsmith>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.1	CC:	dgregor, dmach, dmalcolm, elliot, james.brown, kai, mpoole, myamazak, pvn
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-01-06 19:26:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	756082, 761078

Description Brett Smith 2011-08-25 18:40:01 UTC

Description of problem:

The following packages are missing from the RHEL Server (v. 6 for 64-bit x86_64) Channel
python-2.6.6-20.el6.i686
python-devel-2.6.6-20.el6.i686
python-libs-2.6.6-20.el6.i686
tkinter-2.6.6-20.el6.i686

also missing are python-test and python-tools.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

python-2.6.6

How reproducible:

Search packages on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6 for 64-bit x86_64) for i686 versions of the packages listed above

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:

The i686 versions of the rpms to be there.

Additional info:

Several x86_64 packages have dependencies on the x86 libraries.

Comment 2 Milan Zázrivec 2011-08-26 06:21:06 UTC

I'm assigning this to Daniel Mach for now (I'm obviously a wrong owner).

Comment 17 Dennis Gregorovic 2012-01-06 19:26:00 UTC

32bit python packages are now excluded from the 64bit channels as python is not meant to be multilib.  A workaround for any upgrade issues can be found at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-60896.

Comment 18 Dennis Gregorovic 2012-05-08 18:47:28 UTC

*** Bug 819914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***