| Summary: | Add Spice QXL drivers to virtio-win RPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe> |
| Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Jay Greguske <jgreguske> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 5.8 | CC: | acathrow, bcao, cpelland, leiwang, rhod, shuang, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 726883 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2011-08-31 11:31:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 726883 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 733960 | ||
|
Comment 3
Mike Cao
2011-08-29 05:51:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #3) > Hi, Vadim > > Is this one dup of Bug 726884 ? Hi Mike, It was a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726883 > and since the bugs status is ON_QA ,but I didn't see any changelog related to > this bug. I think it was done automatically by Errata system, switching it back to NEW. Kind regards, Vadim. > > Best Regards, > Mike (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Hi, Vadim > > > > Is this one dup of Bug 726884 ? > Hi Mike, > It was a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726883 Hi Vadim , Could you re-check ? I still think this bug is dup of Bug 726884 which is already been fixed Best Regards, Mike (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Hi, Vadim > > > > > > Is this one dup of Bug 726884 ? > > Hi Mike, > > It was a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726883 > > Hi Vadim , > Could you re-check ? I still think this bug is dup of Bug 726884 which is > already been fixed Hi Mike, You are right. I must have missed Bug 726884 somehow, while opening a new Errata https://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/11826 Do you think that Bug 726884 can be closed? Or would you prefer to adjust the Bug Id in Errata and close this bug? Best regards, Vadim. > > Best Regards, > Mike (In reply to comment #6) > > Hi Mike, > > You are right. > I must have missed Bug 726884 somehow, while opening a new Errata > https://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/11826 > > Do you think that Bug 726884 can be closed? > Or would you prefer to adjust the Bug Id in > Errata and close this bug? > Hi Vadim I prefer to close this one ,since the patch for Bug 726884 has already in the tree . I think better close this one as dup of 726884 ,For the errata ,Is there a errata for Bug 726884 ? If no ,I think we'd better add bug 726884 in the errata bug list Best Regards, Mike (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > You are right. > > I must have missed Bug 726884 somehow, while opening a new Errata > > https://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/11826 > > > > Do you think that Bug 726884 can be closed? > > Or would you prefer to adjust the Bug Id in > > Errata and close this bug? > > > > Hi Vadim > > I prefer to close this one ,since the patch for Bug 726884 has already in the > tree . > I think better close this one as dup of 726884 ,For the errata ,Is there a > errata for Bug 726884 ? If no ,I think we'd better add bug 726884 in the errata > bug list Will do it. But unfortunately, right now I cannot add 726884 to Errata https://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/show/11826 due to lack of some flags. Best, Vadim. > > Best Regards, > Mike *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 726884 *** |