Bug 733941

Summary: [abrt] evince-2.32.0-4.fc14: gs_settransfer_remap: Process /usr/bin/evince-thumbnailer was killed by signal 4 (SIGILL)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Wiebe van der Zee <ausstra>
Component: evinceAssignee: Marek Kašík <mkasik>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: mkasik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:f30dc2d8473d7fd30ae6de657fddcb716316eda8
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-21 16:48:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Wiebe van der Zee 2011-08-28 19:31:15 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.18
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 23505 bytes
cmdline: evince-thumbnailer -s 128 file:///home/wiebe/Documents/NHA/ANW/les20_fig.dvi /tmp/.gnome_desktop_thumbnail.6YJV0V
component: evince
Attached file: coredump, 7761920 bytes
crash_function: gs_settransfer_remap
executable: /usr/bin/evince-thumbnailer
kernel: 2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686
package: evince-2.32.0-4.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evince-thumbnailer was killed by signal 4 (SIGILL)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1314559076
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Due to problems with evince, I am using another viewer bij default
2.While selecting another pdf-file, I got teh message that evince had crashed.
3.

Comment 1 Wiebe van der Zee 2011-08-28 19:31:22 UTC
Created attachment 520248 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 abrt-bot 2012-03-21 16:48:07 UTC
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #773309, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #601759, bug #607331, bug #629258, bug #636320, bug #640469, bug #642085, bug #649547, bug #657762, bug #666709, bug #667821, bug #669871, bug #698751, bug #706766, bug #717005, bug #721180, bug #773309

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 773309 ***