Bug 734119
Summary: | Review Request: libwbxml-compat - Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Petr Šabata <psabata> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | notting, package-review, psabata |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | psabata:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-09-09 17:04:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 731304 |
Description
Petr Pisar
2011-08-29 13:50:29 UTC
Package: libwbxml-compat Version: 0.10.9 Release: 1.fc15 Sources: libwbxml-0.10.9.tar.bz2 Patches: libwbxml-0.10.9-pkg-config-module-links-against-compat-library.patch ---------- Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide. Package successfully built in koji, f16. MUST items: [ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english [ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary architecture [ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports [ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions) [ OK ] No errors reported by rpmlint [ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted [ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags [ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified otherwise [ OK ] Requires correct or justified otherwise [ OK ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise [ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding [ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding [ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage [ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc [ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable [ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time [ ?? ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified [ OK ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages [ OK ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage [ OK ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage [ OK ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage [ OK ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages [ OK ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all subpackages, if applicable [ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage [ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo [ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries [ OK ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries [ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise [ OK ] No config files are located under /usr [ -- ] Package contains working systemd unit files and requires systemd-units [ -- ] All systemd unit files are named according to the Guidelines [ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript only as an optional addition to systemd unit files [ -- ] If package contains an initscript, it's placed in sysvinit subpackage [ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file [ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified otherwise [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros [ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} does NOT work [ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time [ OK ] globals used in place of defines [ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses find_lang, if applicable [ OK ] Scriptlets are sane [ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified [ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content [ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or uses unless those are already owned by another package [ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses [ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts [ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules [ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data [ OK ] Final Requires and Provides are sane SHOULD items: [ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period [ OK ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot removal in install section [ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps [ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio, diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info, make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip, util-linux-ng, which or xz [ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters [ OK ] Package uses parallel make [ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share instead of /var/www [ NOTE ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link [ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables [ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass [ ?? ] Package works as expected NOTES: ------ I don't know if cmake actually respects Fedora CFLAGS but the package is written in compliance with the Guidelines. The patch is self-explanatory. Approving. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libwbxml-compat Short Description: Library to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents Owners: ppisar awjb Branches: f16 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). psabata, please take ownership of your review BZs. Thanks! Thank you for the review and the repository. libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16,libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16,libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16 Package libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16, libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16 libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16,libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback). libwbxml-0.11.0-1.fc16, libwbxml-compat-0.10.9-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |